Taking SEO To The Next Level - LSI
July 5th, 2007 by CourtThe future of search engine optimization is LSI, which stands for latent semantic indexing. The idea is already being used by Google and will likely have a more powerful effect on search engine rankings as the technology becomes more complete. Sites designed with the technology in mind are already dominating the search results and include Wikipedia, The Wall Street Journal Online, and ESPN.com.
LSI takes indexing to the next level by creating a database of terms that appear close to each other on web pages. Let’s use the keyword ’search engine optmization’ for example. There are quite a few words that you would commonly find while reading about SEO including internet, website, search engine, marketing, ranking, positioning, placement, services, and search.
LSI technology says that a page that contains all of those terms will likely have better information than a page that doesn’t. This means that you will be able to get a page more highly ranked for the keyword ’search engine optimization’ by adding the related terms to that page. No matter what keyword you’re trying to get ranked for, there will be ‘magic words’ that should be added to the page you’re trying to get ranked.
Finding The Magic Words
In order to find the related, ‘magic’ words that should be included on your page, you can use a free service called Quintura. You can type in any keyword, and the service will show you the words that appear next to your keyword on other web pages.
In this example to the left, you can see a typical keyword bubble created with Quintura - it’s the bubble I created when I typed in ’search engine optimization’. The words that are bigger and bolder are more often found on pages that rank well for ’search engine optimization’.
Adding each of these words to a page about ’search engine optimization’ will help it to rank better for that keyword. This concept can help anyone to get better search engine rankings. The interesting thing to me is that it will also help us to write better documents.
Bonus SEO Tip
If you want to take this idea up to an even higher level, you can create a separate page that describes each of the ‘magic words’. That way you can link out to a page about each of the words, adding even more relevancy to your original document.
Related Posts:
When Do You Give Up On A Niche Site?
Lately we have been talking quite a bit about a few different concepts that relate directly to SEO (...
Clarification on Court’s Links
I've been loving reading through the articles and posts that everyone has submitted for Court's Link...
Online Case Study - MakingSalesMakingMoney.com
It's time to take a look at another online business. Being featured in this type of study on Courtâ€...
10 Games And Lessons That Helped Me Lose My Worst-Typer-Ever Championship Status
You only need these if you have a blog, website, desk job, computer, or email access. The rest of yo...
I Changed One Of My Main Sites To A Blog
This morning I've been taking some time to change one if my sites into a blog. I haven't updated the...
The Best Article Or Post Of Your Life Challenge
No matter what level our blogs or websites are at, we need to continually challenge ourselves to imp...









July 5th, 2007 at 11:05 am
Google does not use LSI and neither does any other major search engine.
I attempted to clear up the misunderstanding with a couple of recent posts; What is Latent Semantic Indexing and The LSI Myth.
Hope that helps.
- Michael
July 5th, 2007 at 1:23 pm
Hi Michael! I read both of your posts. They are well written and I’m sure they took a lot of work. Even though we’re both talking about LSI we’re not at all talking about the same thing.
I’m not implying that Google uses simple text matching to determine their results. You said that it can’t work because it doesn’t take synonymy into account. How do you know it doesn’t take synonymy into account? We already know that Google uses synonymy on a huge scale, you don’t think they can apply it to this? I think for you to say that Google doesn’t use it at all is a little short sighted.
Your argument assumes that Google uses it across the entire web and it’s quite obvious that they wouldn’t use it that way. Why would they use it across billions of documents that they have already determined to be irrelevant? They would only use it across documents that were already relevant for each search term - wouldn’t it make sense that using it that way would give them a better data set?
You’re also assuming that I’m saying that LSI is going to be the only way Google calculates results. That isn’t the case and I didn’t even say that it was currently a huge factor. There are too many factors to say that about any single one.
No matter what I think it’s good to keep an open mind when new ideas surface.
July 9th, 2007 at 1:55 pm
Whether they use this exact system or not, the important thing that this can remind us of is that content is very important. That’s why keyword stuffing is such a bad idea. You want the site to be related, using similar words that help it all be about the same topic.
July 10th, 2007 at 2:29 pm
[…] http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/07/05/taking-seo-to-the-next-level-lsi/ […]
July 26th, 2007 at 4:47 am
When do you think LSI will start to be used? I’m not sure if I’m too keen on someone like Google changing their method of ranking pages so much
August 4th, 2007 at 12:24 pm
[…] Also, use LSI when writing the article (get information about LSI here) […]
May 13th, 2008 at 6:44 am
Retrieving valuable content pages through LSI will infact only help site owners to have the right traffics