<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RealRank™ Doesn&#8217;t Solve Anything For Bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/</link>
	<description>Growth For Persistent, Intelligent People.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: What Is SocialSpark RealRank? &#8211; CheatAd !</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-175835</link>
		<dc:creator>What Is SocialSpark RealRank? &#8211; CheatAd !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank%e2%84%a2-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-175835</guid>
		<description>[...] about RealRanks: Problogger Big Foot Web Marketing Courtney Turtle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] about RealRanks: Problogger Big Foot Web Marketing Courtney Turtle [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FDJustin</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-17749</link>
		<dc:creator>FDJustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank%e2%84%a2-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-17749</guid>
		<description>After reading all the comments so far I'm.. Surprised to say I don't really have much to add.  At least I can look at you, Denise, and note: If google uses PR for determining (in part) where a website lands on the search results, that's all they need it for.  They don't gain or lose benefit from... OK, they actually lose benefit from advertisers selling pagerank.

I have a good way to back that up, too!  OK, when was the last time you used yahoo?  Was it a couple years ago?  Do you remember something that looked like this?
Search: TCG results 102937391 page 1 of 999999

Mommas hot sex slave! (the site)
TCG, SEX, SEX, PORN, HERO, BORED, INANE, ANNOYING, WHAT THE HELL, etc. (the body of the text).
About thirty listings later...
Welcome to Bob's TCG emporium. (the site)
Bob is a cool guy that is really into TCGs, CCGs, and other... (the body of the text.)

So ... You click on bobs, right?  And lo and behold, after a hundred popups that you  hit alt+f4 until your fingers fell off to battle against, you find you now have twelve new infections, and bob's is... A link farm.

I'm not going to say google is pure and innocent, or even that I fully believe paid links should be set no-follow.  But I am going to say, if they're working to keep those kinds of posts away from my keywords, I'm thankful for that.

Oh.. And someone mentioned a half-way point earlier.  That wouldn't be too bad.. Maybe count paid links as a PR0 link instead of completely discounting it.  It would completely level the playing field so that advertisers still get a little out of it, along with the incoming traffic from the site...  And those who have trouble getting links otherwise, such as an online store have a chance against the big names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading all the comments so far I&#8217;m.. Surprised to say I don&#8217;t really have much to add.  At least I can look at you, Denise, and note: If google uses PR for determining (in part) where a website lands on the search results, that&#8217;s all they need it for.  They don&#8217;t gain or lose benefit from&#8230; OK, they actually lose benefit from advertisers selling pagerank.</p>
<p>I have a good way to back that up, too!  OK, when was the last time you used yahoo?  Was it a couple years ago?  Do you remember something that looked like this?<br />
Search: TCG results 102937391 page 1 of 999999</p>
<p>Mommas hot sex slave! (the site)<br />
TCG, SEX, SEX, PORN, HERO, BORED, INANE, ANNOYING, WHAT THE HELL, etc. (the body of the text).<br />
About thirty listings later&#8230;<br />
Welcome to Bob&#8217;s TCG emporium. (the site)<br />
Bob is a cool guy that is really into TCGs, CCGs, and other&#8230; (the body of the text.)</p>
<p>So &#8230; You click on bobs, right?  And lo and behold, after a hundred popups that you  hit alt+f4 until your fingers fell off to battle against, you find you now have twelve new infections, and bob&#8217;s is&#8230; A link farm.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to say google is pure and innocent, or even that I fully believe paid links should be set no-follow.  But I am going to say, if they&#8217;re working to keep those kinds of posts away from my keywords, I&#8217;m thankful for that.</p>
<p>Oh.. And someone mentioned a half-way point earlier.  That wouldn&#8217;t be too bad.. Maybe count paid links as a PR0 link instead of completely discounting it.  It would completely level the playing field so that advertisers still get a little out of it, along with the incoming traffic from the site&#8230;  And those who have trouble getting links otherwise, such as an online store have a chance against the big names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-17445</link>
		<dc:creator>LP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank%e2%84%a2-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-17445</guid>
		<description>Except google there are other excellent search engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except google there are other excellent search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IZEA Launches RealRank - Will You Opt In?</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-16195</link>
		<dc:creator>IZEA Launches RealRank - Will You Opt In?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank%e2%84%a2-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-16195</guid>
		<description>[...] Others have expressed concern over it as they think it’ll be a signal to Google that you’re selling links. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Others have expressed concern over it as they think it’ll be a signal to Google that you’re selling links. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IZEA Launches RealRank - Will You Opt In?</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-16166</link>
		<dc:creator>IZEA Launches RealRank - Will You Opt In?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank%e2%84%a2-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-16166</guid>
		<description>[...] Others have expressed concern over it as they think it&#8217;ll be a signal to Google that you&#8217;re selling links. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Others have expressed concern over it as they think it&#8217;ll be a signal to Google that you&#8217;re selling links. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-12836</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank%e2%84%a2-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-12836</guid>
		<description>The people who make money through PPP are the ones who are going to benefit, as well as advertisers. 

What nobody has mentioned is that even though Google took the PR away from many blogs they are still getting Google backlinks. Opps will still have the option of using do follow as well as no follow and the advertisers can actually see what kind of traffic a site is getting. 

Google didn't just take PR away from Posties, it has been an internet wide problem. But what Google doesn't realize is that they have shot themselves in the foot by doing this. PR officially now means much less and as more and more people figure out what's going on it will become obsolete. Google created it, we accepted it, and WE can refuse to accept it. Google does not own the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people who make money through PPP are the ones who are going to benefit, as well as advertisers. </p>
<p>What nobody has mentioned is that even though Google took the PR away from many blogs they are still getting Google backlinks. Opps will still have the option of using do follow as well as no follow and the advertisers can actually see what kind of traffic a site is getting. </p>
<p>Google didn&#8217;t just take PR away from Posties, it has been an internet wide problem. But what Google doesn&#8217;t realize is that they have shot themselves in the foot by doing this. PR officially now means much less and as more and more people figure out what&#8217;s going on it will become obsolete. Google created it, we accepted it, and WE can refuse to accept it. Google does not own the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanye West</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-12157</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanye West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank%e2%84%a2-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-12157</guid>
		<description>The big question is who’s really going to benefit from the RealRank by PayPerPost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big question is who’s really going to benefit from the RealRank by PayPerPost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do Blog Rankings Matter? &#60;&#60; Vandelay Website Design</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-11327</link>
		<dc:creator>Do Blog Rankings Matter? &#60;&#60; Vandelay Website Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 01:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank%e2%84%a2-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-11327</guid>
		<description>[...] There are a lot of different ranking systems currently being used for blogs. Google’s PageRank has been the subject of more than its share of blog discussions recently. In addition to PageRank, there’s always Technorati and Alexa rankings, and recently IZEA (the parent company of PayPerPost) has decided to move away from PageRank and create its own RealRank. (For information on RealRank, see Courtney Tuttle’s Real Rank Doesn’t Solve Anything for Bloggers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] There are a lot of different ranking systems currently being used for blogs. Google’s PageRank has been the subject of more than its share of blog discussions recently. In addition to PageRank, there’s always Technorati and Alexa rankings, and recently IZEA (the parent company of PayPerPost) has decided to move away from PageRank and create its own RealRank. (For information on RealRank, see Courtney Tuttle’s Real Rank Doesn’t Solve Anything for Bloggers. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealRank Won't Work With Google PR</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-11316</link>
		<dc:creator>RealRank Won't Work With Google PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank%e2%84%a2-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-11316</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote a great article that RealRank Doesn&#8217;t Solve Anything for Bloggers. By accepting this new form of ranking, he states that google won&#8217;t like it. This may even [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] wrote a great article that RealRank Doesn&#8217;t Solve Anything for Bloggers. By accepting this new form of ranking, he states that google won&#8217;t like it. This may even [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Rank - Don't Be Hatin' &#124; Bush Mackel</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-11239</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Rank - Don't Be Hatin' &#124; Bush Mackel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/11/20/realrank%e2%84%a2-doesnt-solve-anything-for-bloggers/#comment-11239</guid>
		<description>[...] ball you&#8217;re on. The reason why I felt obliged to make this post was because of Court&#8217;s post on the subject, where for him it came down to the question,  Can You Survive Without [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ball you&#8217;re on. The reason why I felt obliged to make this post was because of Court&#8217;s post on the subject, where for him it came down to the question,  Can You Survive Without [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
