<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Bloggers Are Just Silly (Google Linking Issues)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/</link>
	<description>Growth For Persistent, Intelligent People.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Have You Reclaimed Your PageRank Yet? &#124; Pajama Professional</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-29002</link>
		<dc:creator>Have You Reclaimed Your PageRank Yet? &#124; Pajama Professional</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-29002</guid>
		<description>[...] Jennifer Laycock and Robert Clough from Search Engine Guide to a very thorough explanation of the reasons for the Google slap from Courtney Tuttle.  I read these articles and tried to remedy the situation by removing TNX ads [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Jennifer Laycock and Robert Clough from Search Engine Guide to a very thorough explanation of the reasons for the Google slap from Courtney Tuttle.  I read these articles and tried to remedy the situation by removing TNX ads [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-24881</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-24881</guid>
		<description>Court first of all thank you sooo sooo sooo much for all of your information! I have a site (which you can see by removing the @yahoo from my email address) and I am trying to figure out a way to get the girls to link to me. Is it ok for me to have a linking contest? Like, can I say "Place this link on your blog or whatever and whoever sends the most people will get a gift certificate?" As you can see my site is not about internet marketing so I don't know if Google will get on me for that. Please let me know if you have any advice for me! Thanks so much again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Court first of all thank you sooo sooo sooo much for all of your information! I have a site (which you can see by removing the @yahoo from my email address) and I am trying to figure out a way to get the girls to link to me. Is it ok for me to have a linking contest? Like, can I say &#8220;Place this link on your blog or whatever and whoever sends the most people will get a gift certificate?&#8221; As you can see my site is not about internet marketing so I don&#8217;t know if Google will get on me for that. Please let me know if you have any advice for me! Thanks so much again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ephena</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-20466</link>
		<dc:creator>Ephena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-20466</guid>
		<description>All this fuss over what Google thinks about how the Internet should work. Seriously, am I the only one who see something wrong here. They index the web content,  and sell ads to their visitors... that's it. They don't own the Internet, it's not theirs. They are coming to monopolize the greatest thing ever. SOmething that doesn't and shouldn't belong to anybody and that nobody should control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this fuss over what Google thinks about how the Internet should work. Seriously, am I the only one who see something wrong here. They index the web content,  and sell ads to their visitors&#8230; that&#8217;s it. They don&#8217;t own the Internet, it&#8217;s not theirs. They are coming to monopolize the greatest thing ever. SOmething that doesn&#8217;t and shouldn&#8217;t belong to anybody and that nobody should control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maria ozawa</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-20313</link>
		<dc:creator>maria ozawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-20313</guid>
		<description>i can't believe you actually did this: 

I have always been very liberal in linking out. On multiple occasions I’ve linked out to 40+ brand new sites at a time. This is fine as long as they are providing something of value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can&#8217;t believe you actually did this: </p>
<p>I have always been very liberal in linking out. On multiple occasions I’ve linked out to 40+ brand new sites at a time. This is fine as long as they are providing something of value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Old Vic</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-18782</link>
		<dc:creator>The Old Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-18782</guid>
		<description>It seems to me the whole blogosphere is governed by confusion, a bit like walking into a library without knowing how to read - so you ask someone what you need to do to write a book, which is why people who claim to know what they're doing attract so many confused readers. Plus the rules keep changing every few months ! Quite a circus really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me the whole blogosphere is governed by confusion, a bit like walking into a library without knowing how to read - so you ask someone what you need to do to write a book, which is why people who claim to know what they&#8217;re doing attract so many confused readers. Plus the rules keep changing every few months ! Quite a circus really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seocontest2008</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-18777</link>
		<dc:creator>seocontest2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-18777</guid>
		<description>What comes around goes around i guess. I try not to let the power of Google run the way i promote on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What comes around goes around i guess. I try not to let the power of Google run the way i promote on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Spaulding</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-13512</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Spaulding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-13512</guid>
		<description>Good points Courtney. However, I think there are a couple other times in which using the rel="nofollow" attribute is valuable:

&lt;b&gt;1.&lt;/b&gt; restricting PR (authority) from flowing to useless links ie. affiliate links, bookmarketing links etc.

&lt;b&gt;2.&lt;/b&gt; To control your own internal link juice. For instance, I use Andy Beard's "nofollow those dupes" plugin to nofollow all links on the homepage in order to drive the juice into my money pages. This does take from the temporary front-page link that people would be getting, but it puts more juice into the pages that really matter in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Courtney. However, I think there are a couple other times in which using the rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; attribute is valuable:</p>
<p><b>1.</b> restricting PR (authority) from flowing to useless links ie. affiliate links, bookmarketing links etc.</p>
<p><b>2.</b> To control your own internal link juice. For instance, I use Andy Beard&#8217;s &#8220;nofollow those dupes&#8221; plugin to nofollow all links on the homepage in order to drive the juice into my money pages. This does take from the temporary front-page link that people would be getting, but it puts more juice into the pages that really matter in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monika @ The Writers Manifesto</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-12953</link>
		<dc:creator>Monika @ The Writers Manifesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-12953</guid>
		<description>Hi Court,

I can partially understand why there is so much confusion going on about linking. I personally got rid of my do follow comments when I read an article by a fellow marketer and good friend of mine. (Grizzly) (I believe you know him)

It made perfect sense to me what he was saying and to take the do follow Plugin off was my decision alone based on what I have learned over the last couple of month.

I simply don't want to risk loosing my PR after all the hard work I have put into my blog. Some say that is silly, I say it is how I feel and what I belief to be true.

Whether it will be penalized or not it is still an open book, but I chose not to take my chances.

Do I panic? No, I don't, I simply made a business decision which I feel is right for me. So you can't blame other bloggers for making theirs.

I happen to value my PR and therefore I need to do everything I can to retain it.

Others simply do the same. As for linking in blog posts, the only sites I place nofollow links are those who are heavy trafficked and affiliate programs. (I also learnt this lately)

I had to learn the hard way as I'm also a victim of PPP reviews. I didn't know about the existing rule prior to all going public and I have been cruising the net for 4 years now. It's like knowing that the car tires you drive are dangerous for your car without anybody telling you.

I never understood this dofollow and nofollow business until the carpet got pulled from under me . How do you expect those bloggers feel who just came online?

We all fuel each others beliefs by what we say. Some say the sky is blue and others say it is pink. They are both correct even though it doesn't seem this way first.

Since I don't work for Google and I don't read their rules I learn by mistakes and listening to others whom I respect. You are one of those I respect, but it doesn't mean that I do agree with your statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Court,</p>
<p>I can partially understand why there is so much confusion going on about linking. I personally got rid of my do follow comments when I read an article by a fellow marketer and good friend of mine. (Grizzly) (I believe you know him)</p>
<p>It made perfect sense to me what he was saying and to take the do follow Plugin off was my decision alone based on what I have learned over the last couple of month.</p>
<p>I simply don&#8217;t want to risk loosing my PR after all the hard work I have put into my blog. Some say that is silly, I say it is how I feel and what I belief to be true.</p>
<p>Whether it will be penalized or not it is still an open book, but I chose not to take my chances.</p>
<p>Do I panic? No, I don&#8217;t, I simply made a business decision which I feel is right for me. So you can&#8217;t blame other bloggers for making theirs.</p>
<p>I happen to value my PR and therefore I need to do everything I can to retain it.</p>
<p>Others simply do the same. As for linking in blog posts, the only sites I place nofollow links are those who are heavy trafficked and affiliate programs. (I also learnt this lately)</p>
<p>I had to learn the hard way as I&#8217;m also a victim of PPP reviews. I didn&#8217;t know about the existing rule prior to all going public and I have been cruising the net for 4 years now. It&#8217;s like knowing that the car tires you drive are dangerous for your car without anybody telling you.</p>
<p>I never understood this dofollow and nofollow business until the carpet got pulled from under me . How do you expect those bloggers feel who just came online?</p>
<p>We all fuel each others beliefs by what we say. Some say the sky is blue and others say it is pink. They are both correct even though it doesn&#8217;t seem this way first.</p>
<p>Since I don&#8217;t work for Google and I don&#8217;t read their rules I learn by mistakes and listening to others whom I respect. You are one of those I respect, but it doesn&#8217;t mean that I do agree with your statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Furniture Store</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-12945</link>
		<dc:creator>Furniture Store</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-12945</guid>
		<description>I thought your headline was really funny and that's why it caught my eye. 

Agree with you there, some bloggers seem to cut off their nose in order to spite their face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought your headline was really funny and that&#8217;s why it caught my eye. </p>
<p>Agree with you there, some bloggers seem to cut off their nose in order to spite their face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-12840</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/12/11/google-linking-issues/#comment-12840</guid>
		<description>LMAO I did the search for the same thing I am like mmm I can cash out on this domain lol ohh well maybe we can coin another term and cash out on the domain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMAO I did the search for the same thing I am like mmm I can cash out on this domain lol ohh well maybe we can coin another term and cash out on the domain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
